Monday, 6 July 2026 · Independent · Unbought
Latest
Middle East · Analysis

Prosecutor testifies Israel tried to silence genocide probe

Former ICC chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda testifies that Israel waged a pressure campaign to stop her office investigating potential genocide in Palestine.

Prosecutor testifies Israel tried to silence genocide probe
Image: https://www.facebook.com/middleeastmonitor

Former ICC prosecutor describes Israeli pressure campaign

Fatou Bensouda, the former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, has testified that Israel conducted a systematic campaign of diplomatic pressure aimed at silencing her office’s investigation into potential genocide in Palestine.

During court proceedings related to the ICC’s investigation into the situation in Palestine, Bensouda detailed how Israeli officials sought to undermine her office’s work through various means of coercion and intimidation. This was the first time a senior ICC official has publicly described the extent of what she called pressure from the Israeli government.

Investigation continues despite pressure

The ICC’s investigation into potential war crimes and crimes against humanity in Palestine has proceeded despite the reported pressure campaign. Bensouda testified that her office faced repeated attempts to challenge the court’s jurisdiction and credibility.

“The pressure was sustained and calculated,” Bensouda stated during her testimony. “It was clear that the objective was to prevent this investigation from moving forward.”

Human rights organisations have long called for accountability in the Palestine situation, with the ICC being one of the few international mechanisms capable of pursuing cases.

Israeli government denies allegations

The Israeli government has denied conducting any improper pressure campaign against the ICC. Israeli officials have consistently maintained that the court’s investigation lacks jurisdiction and that Israeli domestic mechanisms are sufficient to address any alleged violations.

International law experts say the case tests the ICC’s independence and ability to pursue investigations against powerful states.